Opinion-editorial written by:
Joel Mark Baysa-Barredo Joel is Programme Director of SHAPE-SEA. He would like to thank Patricia Miranda, a health and human rights campaigner based in the Philippines, for additional information and insights.
Securitization of COVID-19 in Southeast Asia: Human Rights, Inequality, and Social Consequences
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted governments across Southeast Asia to adopt securitized and militarized responses framed around national security. While these measures aimed to curb the spread of the virus, they also enabled the expansion of emergency powers, restriction of civil liberties, and suppression of dissent. This article argues that the securitization of COVID-19 has produced significant social, economic, and human rights costs, particularly for vulnerable populations such as informal workers, migrants, women, and LGBTIQ communities. Drawing on regional examples, the paper highlights how pandemic governance often deepened existing inequalities and underscores the need for rights-based and inclusive approaches to crisis response.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic in Southeast Asia has exhibited the key elements of securitization, where a public health issue is framed as an existential threat requiring extraordinary state measures. Governments in countries such as the Philippines and Cambodia enacted emergency laws granting sweeping powers to enforce public order, often justified as necessary to address both health and economic crises. Initial responses—such as lockdowns, travel bans, and border closures—quickly evolved into stricter forms of control, including surveillance, detention, and restrictions on access to information (Chen, 2020).
However, beyond the rhetoric of security and crisis management, lived experiences across the region reveal that such approaches come at a significant cost. Highly securitized responses, particularly in contexts with weak social safety nets and legal protections, have exacerbated vulnerabilities and generated new forms of risk (Miranda & Angkaya, 2020). By adopting wartime narratives, states have legitimized the suspension of fundamental rights and freedoms, compelling citizens to comply with restrictive policies under threat of punishment (Carbonaro, 2020; Nunez, 2020).
Militarized Responses and Shrinking Civic Space
Across Southeast Asia, governments relied heavily on militarized strategies to manage the pandemic. Emergency laws and policies were frequently used not only for public health purposes but also to suppress dissent and limit civic engagement. In Cambodia, the State of Emergency Law empowered authorities to monitor telecommunications and restrict social media use. Similarly, in the Philippines, the Bayanihan to Heal As One Act was used to arrest activists and critics accused of spreading “fake news” or inciting dissent.
In Indonesia and Timor-Leste, restrictions on public expression and arbitrary arrests further illustrated how pandemic governance enabled the expansion of state control. Activists and development workers—who played crucial roles in supporting communities and advocating for health-centered responses—were often treated as threats to national security agendas (Adorador, 2020). These developments contributed to the shrinking of democratic space and the erosion of accountability mechanisms.
Frontline Workers at Risk
Frontline workers in the region have borne the brunt of inadequate government support. Despite repeated calls for sufficient personal protective equipment (PPE) and expanded testing, many governments failed to respond effectively (Salsabila, 2020). In some cases, unscientific or inconsistent messaging from public officials contributed to rising infection rates and public confusion (Hasanah, 2020).
Moreover, healthcare workers faced stigma, discrimination, and even violence, further complicating their already precarious conditions (Kurniawan, 2020; Catolico, 2020). In conflict-affected areas, militarized enforcement measures created environments of fear and silence, undermining trust between communities and authorities (Abo & Ayao, 2020).
The Precarity of Informal and Marginalized Communities
The pandemic has disproportionately affected informal workers and economically marginalized groups. In many Southeast Asian countries, social distancing measures were impractical for individuals living in overcrowded conditions or relying on daily wages for survival (Abuso, 2020). Limited access to government aid and healthcare services further compounded these challenges.
In Thailand, informal workers struggled to access health insurance and financial assistance, while in Timor-Leste, delays and inadequacies in subsidy distribution left vulnerable populations in precarious situations (Cassinerio, 2020; Da Fonseca, 2020). Migrant workers, refugees, and stateless individuals were particularly at risk due to legal and social exclusion. Many were forced to violate public health measures simply to survive, exposing them to legal penalties and health risks (Jalil, 2020; Jittiang, 2020).
The situation in Singapore highlighted systemic inequalities, as initial public health support measures largely excluded migrant workers, leading to significant outbreaks within dormitory populations. This has been described as a form of “hidden apartheid” based on citizenship status (Petcharamesree, 2020).
Gendered Impacts of the Pandemic
A gendered analysis reveals that women and LGBTIQ communities have experienced disproportionate impacts from both the pandemic and securitized responses. Women, who constitute a significant portion of the informal workforce, faced heightened economic insecurity due to business closures and job losses (Chen, 2020).
Additionally, gender norms have intensified unpaid care responsibilities, particularly in contexts where healthcare systems are overwhelmed. Lockdowns also contributed to a rise in domestic violence, as victims were confined with their abusers and faced barriers to seeking help (Try, 2020).
LGBTIQ individuals encountered heightened discrimination and violence, both within households and in public spaces. Incidents in countries such as the Philippines and Indonesia demonstrated how stigma and prejudice were exacerbated during the pandemic, often with limited accountability from authorities (Thoreson, 2020; Saputra, 2020). These experiences highlight how securitization can reinforce existing social inequalities and marginalization.
Discussion: Rethinking Crisis Governance
The securitization of COVID-19 in Southeast Asia reveals a fundamental tension between public health objectives and human rights protections. While emergency measures may be justified in times of crisis, their implementation must be proportionate, transparent, and time-bound. The experiences discussed in this article demonstrate that overly militarized approaches can undermine public trust, exacerbate inequalities, and create long-term governance challenges.
A shift toward rights-based and inclusive frameworks is essential. This includes strengthening social protection systems, ensuring equitable access to healthcare, and promoting meaningful participation from marginalized communities in decision-making processes. Such approaches not only address immediate needs but also enhance resilience against future crises.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed structural weaknesses in governance, social protection, and human rights frameworks across Southeast Asia. While securitized responses may have provided short-term control, they have also generated significant social and political costs, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Moving forward, governments must prioritize people-centered approaches that balance public health imperatives with the protection of rights and freedoms. Breaking the silence around discrimination, inequality, and abuse is critical to building more just and resilient societies in the post-pandemic era. Ultimately, effective crisis response must place human dignity, inclusivity, and accountability at its core.
References (APA 7th Edition)
Abo, N., & Ayao, A. (2020). The compounded threat of COVID-19 and armed conflict in Mindanao. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/the-compounded-threat-of-covid-19-and-armed-conflict-in-mindanao/
Abuso, M. G. (2020). Understanding the social dimension of receiving aid. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/understanding-the-social-dimension-of-receiving-aid/
Adorador, S. (2020). Defending human rights in the time of COVID-19: Collective action against state repression in the Philippines. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/defending-human-rights-in-the-time-of-covid-19-collective-action-against-state-repression-in-the-philippines/
Alves, J. (2020). Interrogating the level of freedom of expression and access to information in Timor-Leste in the time of COVID-19. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/interrogating-the-level-of-freedom-of-expression-and-access-to-information-in-timor-leste-in-the-time-of-covid-19/
Ampilan, D. (2020). Communities at the frontlines of beating COVID-19. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/communities-at-the-frontlines-of-beating-covid-19/
Aranas, M. V. (2020). Reducing the weight on women’s shoulders. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/reducing-the-weight-on-womens-shoulders/
Carbonaro, G. (2020). Can we compare the COVID-19 pandemic to a world war? CGTN. https://newseu.cgtn.com/news/2020-05-08/Can-we-compare-the-COVID-19-pandemic-to-a-world-war–Qhw25Ig9Fe/index.html
Cassinerio, J. (2020). Land of smiles? A brief assessment of the effects of COVID-19 on the life of a motorbike taxi driver in Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/land-of-smiles-a-from-formal-into-informal-labour-thailand/
Catolico, G. (2020). Discrimination and social stigma perturbing frontliners and COVID-19 patients in the Philippines. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/discrimination-and-social-stigma-perturbing-frontliners-and-covid-19-patients-in-the-philippines/
Chen, L.-L. (2020a). Human rights and democracy amidst militarized COVID-19 responses in Southeast Asia. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2020/05/13/human-rights-and-democracy-amidst-militarized-covid-19-responses-in-southeast-asia/
Chen, L.-L. (2020b). Securitization of COVID-19 in Timor-Leste: A gender perspective. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/securitization-of-covid-19-in-timor-leste-a-gender-perspective/
Conde, C. (2020). Philippine activists charged with sedition, “fake news”: Government misusing COVID-19 law against its critics. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/04/22/philippine-activists-charged-sedition-fake-news
Da Fonseca, C. (2020). The curious case of subsided subsidies: Failed political promises in the midst of COVID-19 in Timor-Leste. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/the-curious-case-of-subsided-subsidies-failed-political-promises-in-the-midst-of-covid-19-in-timor-leste/
Fauziah, P. (2020). Amnesty Internasional Indonesia: Penganiayaan Ferdian Paleka selama di tahanan melanggar HAM. Pikiran Rakyat Depok. https://depok.pikiran-rakyat.com/nasional/pr-09382328/amnesty-internasional-indonesia-penganiayaan-ferdian-paleka-selama-di-tahanan-melanggar-ham
Hanung, C. (2020). How COVID-19 might disproportionately affect the LGBTIQ community in ASEAN. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/how-covid-19-might-disproportionately-affect-the-lgbtiq-community-in-asean/
Hasanah, M. (2020). Unscientific approach by Indonesian government violates right to information. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/unscientific-approach-by-indonesian-government-violates-right-to-information/
Jalil, A. A. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic: Refugee and state responses in Malaysia. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/covid-19-pandemic-refugee-and-state-responses-in-malaysia/
Jittiang, B. (2020). Is the light getting dimmer for urban refugees in Thailand in the time of COVID-19? SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/is-the-light-getting-dimmer-for-urban-refugees-in-thailand-in-the-time-of-covid-19/
Kurniawan, M. D. (2020). A growing stigma: The danger of discriminating against the rights of healthcare workers. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/a-growing-stigma-the-danger-of-discriminating-against-the-rights-of-healthcare-workers/
Miranda, P., & Angkaya, S. (2020). Legal preparedness during “business unusual.” Philippine Daily Inquirer.
Novio, E. B. (2020). Where do we go from here? An unsettling battle for Filipino migrants in Cambodia and Vietnam amid COVID-19. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/where-do-we-go-from-here-an-unsettling-battle-for-filipino-migrants-in-cambodia-and-vietnam-amid-covid-19/
Nunes, J. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Securitization, neoliberal crisis, and global vulnerabilization. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 36(5). https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0102-311X2020000500501&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
Petcharamesree, S. (2020). COVID-19 in Southeast Asia: Non-citizens have a right to protection too. openDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/pandemic-border/covid-19-southeast-asia-non-citizens-have-right-protection-too/
Pinol, M. (2020). COVID-19 in Cambodia: Leadership or autocracy? SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/covid-19-in-cambodia-leadership-or-autocracy/
Ramachandran, R. M. (2020). Ensuring food security for invisible communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/ensuring-food-security-for-invisible-communities-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
Rumpia, J. R. (2020). At the brink of national terror: Repressive state apparatus in Indonesia’s COVID-19 situation. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/at-the-brink-of-national-terror-repressive-state-apparatus-in-indonesias-covid-19-situation/
Salsabila, S. (2020). The portrait of an Indonesian health frontliner: Strong spirit, vulnerable body. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/the-portrait-of-an-indonesian-health-frontliner-strong-spirit-vulnerable-body/
Saputra, R. (2020). Recent cases of persecution set back LGBT rights advocacy. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/05/27/recent-cases-of-persecution-set-back-lgbt-rights-advocacy.html
Sears, N. A. (2020). The securitization of COVID-19: Three political dilemmas. Global Policy Journal. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/25/03/2020/securitization-covid-19-three-political-dilemmas
Thoreson, R. (2020). Philippines uses humiliation as COVID curfew punishment. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/04/08/philippines-uses-humiliation-covid-curfew-punishment
Try, S. (2020). Flip side of the lockdown in Malaysia: Home may not be safe for women and girls. SHAPE-SEA Southeast Asia in Crisis. https://shapesea.com/op-ed/covid-19/flip-side-of-the-lockdown-in-malaysia-home-may-not-be-safe-for-women-and-girls/